La mise en relation des savoirs

2. Ressources complémentaires

• Assmuth, T., Chen, X., Degeling, C., Haahtela, T., Irvine, K. N., Keune, H., ... & Vikström, S. (2020). Integrative concepts and practices of health in transdisciplinary social ecology. Socio-Ecological Practice Research, 2(1), 71-90.
• Bedessem, B., & Ruphy, S. (2020). Citizen science and scientific objectivity: Mapping out epistemic risks and benefits. Perspectives on Science, 28(5), 630-654.
• Cartwright, N. Evidence-based policy: what’s to be done about relevance ? Philos Stud 143, 127–136 (2009)
• Douglas, H. (2004). The irreducible complexity of objectivity. Synthese, 138(3), 453-473.
• Jasanoff, S. (2011). The practices of objectivity in regulatory science. Social knowledge in the making, 307, 312-17.
• Karsenti, B. 2013. D'une philosophie à l'autre. Les sciences sociales et la politique des modernes. Paris, Gallimard
• Loconto, A., Desquilbet, M., Moreau, T., Couvet, D., & Dorin, B. (2020). The land sparing–land sharing controversy: Tracing the politics of knowledge. Land use policy, 96, 103610.
• Pielke Jr, R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press
• Rigolot, C. (2020). Transdisciplinarity as a discipline and a way of being: complementarities and creative tensions. Humanities and social sciences communications, 7(1), 1-5.
• Robra, B., Pazaitis, A., Giotitsas, C., Pansera, M., 2023. From creative destruction to convivial innovation - a post-growth perspective. Technovation 125, 102760.